Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Friday, 1 April 2011

Why sustainability matters to business

Market competition today has changed and providing great quality products or services is no longer enough to maintain a successful business. There is a huge demand from customers to government agencies for companies to take on corporate responsibility. Stakeholders are expecting companies take responsibility for their impact on the environment and society. The companies that ignore environmental and social issues may limit the value of their business through loss of opportunities.

The companies can embrace sustainability through philanthropy, as part of a risk management strategy, or by integrating sustainable practices into the business model itself. It is important to realize that it is not always easy to integrate sustainability initiatives. Challenges include dealing with increased transparency, measuring results in an efficient manner, including sustainability into decision-making and business processes and retaining momentum. 

This is a video in which Stephen Howard, CEO of Business in the Community, talking about his views on sustainability and what businesses needs to do to ensure an enduring and profitable future. The movie was recorded as a part of a nine day debate ‘Start Summit’ that took place in September 2010 in the London’s Lancaster House. This is an initiative established by HRH The Prince of Wales, which together with partner IBM, aimed to show what a sustainable future for business might look like.




Sunday, 27 February 2011

Duty to tell the truth

‘Spin has become the ubiquitous term for public relations tactics.’ wrote David Miller and William Dinan in their book 'A Century of Spin: How Public Relations Became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power' (2007). The current Public Relations industry is trying to drift from this opinion and blur the image of Public Relations being spinning and lying to the public. It is not easy to stop the stereotype that have grown since the first practitioners such as Edward Bernes and Basil Clarke.

Image by Jens Lumm
What makes it even harder is that current practitioners are admitting that lying is a part of the business. One of Britain’s most famous Public Relations practitioners Max Clifford often acknowledged that he lies on behalf of his clients. He happily admits: ‘I’ve been telling lies on behalf of people, businessmen, politicians and countries for 40 years. It shouldn’t be necessary, but it is. I’d rather be honest, but I cannot be all the time... All PROs at all levels lie through their teeth.’ Many practitioners are devastated by his words and are trying to challenge him in public debates. In 1994 he debated with Quentin Bell about the transparency of the industry and in February 2007 Clifford took part in the PRWeek debate ‘PR has a duty to tell the truth’, against morally and ethically strong personalities from the Public Relations industry such as Peter Crumpler. Max Clifford won the vote at the end of both debates. 
After the debate Peter Crumpler said that he was ‘dismayed and disappointed’ by the result and that this is a bad sign for the future of the industry. His opinion was supported by Simon Cohen, founder of ethical PR agency Global Tolerance.
At the same time, there are some positive voices behind Max Clifford openly expressing his actions. Daniel Rogers’ opinion of the debate that took place in 2007 was: ‘The fact that PR people admit they need to lie occasionally is a sign of growing honesty and confidence in what they do’.
He admitted that by having a debate on ethics in Public Relations, ,the  industry showed evidence of a new maturity. Rogers found optimism in Public Relations people admitting they needed to lie occasionally, which made it different from spinning, when practitioners tried to hide the truth .